<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PHOTOPINE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photopine.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photopine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Photography Brain Dump</title>
		<link>http://photopine.com/item/204</link>
		<comments>http://photopine.com/item/204#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photopine.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a lot of of interesting material about photography on the Internet and each day more is added. I spend many afternoons reading through articles, seeing videos and so on. That got me thinking about sharing the quality links, videos and articles I find when digging around the Web. Dear reader, the best stuff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of of interesting material about photography on the Internet and each day more is added. I spend many afternoons reading through articles, seeing videos and so on. That got me thinking about sharing the quality links, videos and articles I find when digging around the Web. Dear reader, the best stuff can now be found at <a href="http://braindump.photopine.com/">http://braindump.photopine.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photopine.com/item/204/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gratia Telegrams</title>
		<link>http://photopine.com/item/152</link>
		<comments>http://photopine.com/item/152#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photopine.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Photopine has sealed a deal with Gratia Telegrams to deliver high quality photographs that matches their exclusive quality telegrams. Gratia Telegrams are the creative alternative to a greeting card — it can be sent for many events: Birthdays, Anniversaries, Graduations, Weddings, Christenings, Christmas, Mothers day, Fathers day, Valentines day, Romance, Births, the list is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Photopine has sealed a deal with <a href="http://bit.ly/8yAD2q">Gratia Telegrams</a> to deliver high quality photographs that matches their exclusive quality telegrams.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/8yAD2q">Gratia Telegrams</a> are the creative alternative to a greeting card — it can be sent for many events: Birthdays, Anniversaries, Graduations, Weddings, Christenings, Christmas, Mothers day, Fathers day, Valentines day, Romance, Births, the list is endless. The telegrams are sent on paper that will last a Lifetime. 100% cotton with a matching lined Envelope a Gratia Telegram exudes class.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://bit.ly/8yAD2q">Gratia Telegrams</a> for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photopine.com/item/152/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online digital photo printing review 2009</title>
		<link>http://photopine.com/item/102</link>
		<comments>http://photopine.com/item/102#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photopine.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a test of 8 online digital photo printing services and one print made at home with a Canon IP4300 printer. Why this test? I mostly use my photographs in digital form and seldom get them printed but with the latest add-on to my family I had to send some pictures to offline family [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a test of 8 online digital photo printing services and one print made at home with a Canon IP4300 printer.</p>
<p><strong>Why this test? </strong></p>
<p>I mostly use my photographs in digital form and seldom get them printed but with the latest add-on to my family I had to send some pictures to offline family members. I read a couple of test that concluded that almost all photo printing services available for Danes provided the same quality (or bad quality) so I ordered 20 pictures and received them a couple of days later.</p>
<p>Then the shock hit me —  the pictures were really bad… My girlfriend suggested that I should drop my beloved Nikon D200 DSLR camera and buy a normal pocket camera that could produce usable photographs in print. In the evening the same day I checked if my <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B001UH5S3G?tag=porcupinex-21&#038;camp=1406&#038;creative=6394&#038;linkCode=as1&#038;creativeASIN=B001UH5S3G&#038;adid=10VF6SRYFWP1E7R99J4X&#038;">Apple iMac 24″</a> was correct calibrated (using <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B000CR78C4?tag=porcupinex-21&#038;camp=1406&#038;creative=6394&#038;linkCode=as1&#038;creativeASIN=B000CR78C4&#038;adid=1R0K302CTE7HHG8EHQNB&#038;">Huey by Pantone</a>) and everything seemed fine?</p>
<p>I tried ordering 10 photographs from 2 other printing services and one of them looked like the first but the second one looked very different — actually quite good. I ended up with 8 orders at 8 online printing services and made a print on my cheap Canon IP4300 printer. </p>
<p>Instead of keeping the result to myself I will try to share my experience but please keep in mind what equipment I used, primarily that the screen was calibrated by a <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B000CR78C4?tag=porcupinex-21&#038;camp=1406&#038;creative=6394&#038;linkCode=as1&#038;creativeASIN=B000CR78C4&#038;adid=1R0K302CTE7HHG8EHQNB&#038;">Huey device from Pantone</a> (and if possible please remember to deselect the optimize option some online printing services offer).</p>
<p><span id="more-102"></span></p>
<p><strong>Contestants</strong></p>
<p> 1. dk.photobox.com<br />
 2. labnet.dk<br />
 3. extrafilm.com<br />
 4. billedbutikken.dk<br />
 5. foto.com<br />
 6. bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
 7. pixum.com<br />
 8. Apple via Apperture<br />
 9. Canon IP4300 (with Glossy Photo Paper for everyday use)</p>
<p><strong>Rating scale</strong></p>
<p>********** (10/10) Excellent<br />
*********~ (9/10) Very good<br />
********~~ (8/10) Good<br />
*******~~~ (7/10)  More than sufficient<br />
******~~~~ (6/10)  Sufficient<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10)  Nearly sufficient<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10)  Insufficient<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10)  Strongly insufficient<br />
**~~~~~~~~ (2/10)  Poor<br />
*~~~~~~~~~ (1/10)  Very poor</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 1 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_01%20_500.png"></p>
<p>********** (10/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********** (10/10) labnet.dk<br />
*********~ (9/10) extrafilm.com<br />
********~~ (8/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) foto.com<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) pixum.com<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: All services passes this test.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 2 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_02%20_500.png"></p>
<p>********~~ (8/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********~~ (8/10) labnet.dk<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) extrafilm.com<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) foto.com<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
**~~~~~~~~ (2/10) pixum.com<br />
**~~~~~~~~ (2/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: Some services just made the grey in the top of the picture black or just the wrong color.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 3 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_03%20_500.png"></p>
<p>********~~ (8/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
*********~ (9/10) labnet.dk<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) extrafilm.com<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) foto.com<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) pixum.com<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: The background and especially the man to the left just disappeared on some of the prints. The top contestants are having problem with the skin color.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 4 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_04%20_500.png"></p>
<p>*********~ (9/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********** (10/10) labnet.dk<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) extrafilm.com<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) foto.com<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) pixum.com<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: The same as the other pictures.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 5 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_05%20_500.png"></p>
<p>*********~ (9/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
*********~ (9/10) labnet.dk<br />
********~~ (8/10) extrafilm.com<br />
********~~ (8/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) foto.com<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) pixum.com<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: Almost all contestants are  having a hard time making the right skin color.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 6 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_06%20_500.png"></p>
<p>*********~ (9/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********** (10/10) labnet.dk<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) extrafilm.com<br />
********~~ (8/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
********~~ (8/10) foto.com<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10) pixum.com<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: Only labnet.dk could make the dark cloud, the yellow house and the lower right bricks look right. </p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 7 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_07%20_500.png"></p>
<p>*********~ (9/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********** (10/10) labnet.dk<br />
********~~ (8/10) extrafilm.com<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) foto.com<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) pixum.com<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: This photograph got some pretty powerful colors. Only labnet.dk nails those but photobox.com got close.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 8 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_08%20_500.png"></p>
<p>********~~ (8/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********** (10/10) labnet.dk<br />
********~~ (8/10) extrafilm.com<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) foto.com<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) pixum.com<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: Only labnet.dk got this right.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 9 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_09%20_500.png"></p>
<p>*******~~~ (7/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********~~ (8/10) labnet.dk<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10) extrafilm.com<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) foto.com<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) pixum.com<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: Not a single print provider can match what I see on my screen <img src='http://photopine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Picture 10 of 10</h2>
<p><img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_10%20_500.png"></p>
<p>*********~ (9/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
********** (10/10) labnet.dk<br />
****~~~~~~ (4/10) extrafilm.com<br />
*******~~~ (7/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
******~~~~ (6/10) foto.com<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) pixum.com<br />
*****~~~~~ (5/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
***~~~~~~~ (3/10) Canon IP4300</p>
<p>Note: This should be a BW print but some prints got a purple, brown or yellow stain.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p>And here is the average rating for the 10 pictures:</p>
<p>*********½ (9.4/10) labnet.dk<br />
********½~ (8.6/10) dk.photobox.com<br />
******½~~~ (6.7/10) billedbutikken.dk<br />
******½~~~ (6.6/10) extrafilm.com<br />
******~~~~ (6.1/10) foto.com<br />
*****½~~~~ (5.3/10) bilka.dk (luxus quality)<br />
*****~~~~~ (4.9/10) Canon IP4300<br />
****~~~~~~ (4.1/10) Apple via Apperture<br />
****~~~~~~ (3.8/10) pixum.com</p>
<p></p>
<p>Can it really be true that the different is so big? Just to prove my point I dusted off my old Canon 3000 scanner and here is the result:<br />
<img src="/media/review2009/test_2009_color_range.png"></p>
<p>Scary!?</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h2>The final conclusion</h2>
<p>Only two services provided a recommendable service:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.labnet.dk/design/laboratoriet/graphics/framework/logos/logo.png" alt="labnet.dk" width="180px" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.labnet.dk/">labnet.dk</a> makes the best prints but is a bit expensive. (1.60 DKR when ordering 50 prints in 10x15cm)</p>
<p><img src="http://assets.photobox.com/assets/content_graphics/86/14586.jpg?1246012193" alt="photobox.com" width="180px" style="margin-top: 30px;margin-bottom: 8px;" /><br />
<a href="http://dk.photobox.com/">dk.photobox.com</a> makes really good prints considering the price (0.74 DKR when ordering 50 prints in 10x15cm — at the moment they offer prints at 0.49 DKR).</p>
<p></p>
<hr noshade style="margin-top: 40px;">
<p>Notes:<br />
 — Both labnet.dk and dk.photobox.com used Fuji Film paper as the only ones (the other online printing services used different kinds of Kodak paper).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photopine.com/item/102/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
