<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online digital photo printing review 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photopine.com/item/102/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photopine.com/item/102</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://photopine.com/item/102/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photopine.com/?p=102#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Interesting read. Perhaps sending a test pattern (hidden in the photo if need be) to check for grayscale levels from 0 to 100 percent as well as a RGB or CMYK test patterns. This could have shown you have accurate they were in true printing the image with true values in a photo.

It is amazing to see how different the results are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read. Perhaps sending a test pattern (hidden in the photo if need be) to check for grayscale levels from 0 to 100 percent as well as a RGB or CMYK test patterns. This could have shown you have accurate they were in true printing the image with true values in a photo.</p>
<p>It is amazing to see how different the results are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
